The

Gene Tech
Grift

They promised to end race-based governance; now they’re engineering it into law.

MESSAGE THE MINISTER

New Zealanders were promised an end to race-based decision-making.
Yet the new Gene Technology Bill writes it straight into law. It creates
Māori-only advisory committees and embeds identity politics into
scientific regulation.

Science should be guided by evidence, not ethnicity. Regulation should apply
to everyone equally. This Bill rewards consultants, not innovators, and divides Kiwis instead of uniting us.

Tell the Government:

Scrap the race clauses

PROBLEMS WITH THE BILL

Māori Advisory Committee

keyboard_arrow_down

What the Bill Does

Creates a standing committee with statutory recognition to advise the Regulator on Māori relationships with flora/fauna.

Why It’s a Problem

Institutionalises race in regulation; introduces permanent parallel governance.

Definitions of “Māori entity / kaitiaki”

keyboard_arrow_down

What the Bill Does

Explicit racial categories in legislation.

Why It’s a Problem

Contradicts “one standard of citizenship.”

Consultation Requirements

keyboard_arrow_down

What the Bill Does

Regulator must “take into account” advice from Māori advisors in decision-making.

Why It’s a Problem

Creates unequal influence; a voice for some, silence for others.

Public Cost

keyboard_arrow_down

What the Bill Does

Ongoing funding for advisory structures and cultural
assessments.

Why It’s a Problem

Redirects resources away from science and innovation toward bureaucracy.

Issue

What the Bill Does

Why It’s a Problem

Māori Advisory Committee
Creates a standing committee with statutory recognition to advise the Regulator on Māori relationships with flora/fauna.
Institutionalises race in regulation; introduces permanent parallel governance.
Definitions of “Māori entity / kaitiaki”
Explicit racial categories in legislation.
Contradicts “one standard of citizenship.”
Consultation Requirements
Regulator must “take into account” advice from Māori advisors in decision-making.
Creates unequal influence; a voice for some, silence for others.
Public Cost
Ongoing funding for advisory structures and cultural
assessments.
Redirects resources away from science and innovation toward bureaucracy.

Send a letter to
the Ministers

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST